
Court actor · Public record · Missouri
EDWARD L.PAGE
Judge
6 families reportedJefferson CountyLatest report Oct 2026
Sponsored by
SHARE THE SLIDES
The exact pack Meg posts — cover, every family quote, state stats, the global pattern, and the closing cards. Straight from the live generator.
Loading slides…
WHAT FAMILIES SAY
Judge page, he failed to listen to the parent or the parents attorney(s). While he approved subpoenas then told me at court “we cancelled those subpoenas for today’s witnesses” . Listened to children’s division and their narrative. Never asked the questions a judge who upholds the constitution and laws would ask. Very rude and NEVER WORE A TIE. That’s one judge I have no respect for!
Ignored evidence, denied due process, denied motion to establish jurisdiction, delayed reunification
He told me that the violation and deprivation of my Civil Rights were water under the bridge and there's nothing we could do about it because we can't go back in time.
Ignored the Constitution and told us to take the issues to a higher court, ignored evidence, invoked stronger supervised visitation because of our beliefs, ignored a lawful subpoena, delaying the case further, and ignored the best interest of the child.
He kidnapped my son for profit and spite after husband told him to his face CPS is a childtrafficking ring.
Ignored Constitution, due process and did not enforce prosecuting attorney David Casey's subpoena which required a continuance a month later.
Tyrant loves destroying families.
Total tyrant ignoring subpoenas, evidence and facts.
Tyrant using power to destroy American families.
Ignored Constitution, subpoena and evidence.
Ignored Constitution, ignored subpoenas and motions ruled on hearsay
Ignored Constitution, ruled by feelings, ignored subpoenas from Prosecuting Attorney, ignored evidence
Denied motions, made threats of contempt, denied evidence. Did not follow MO §452.375. Refused to revised or correct judgment that did not follow this statute.
He's currently retiring after just announcing re-election.
These are allegations reported directly by families through the survey. They are published because 6 unrelated households independently described this court actor — the public-record threshold.
Family-reported submissions.