Gregg Lundberg — family-reported Attorney

Court actor · Public record · Texas

GreggLundberg

Attorney

4 families reportedEllis CountyLatest report Jun 2026

SHARE THE SLIDES

The exact pack Meg posts — cover, every family quote, state stats, the global pattern, and the closing cards. Straight from the live generator.

Share slides are being generated for this court actor — check back shortly.


WHAT FAMILIES SAY

Took on my case after his son the asociate judge Kenneth Lundberg signed a TRO taking my kids away. Fired himself when I got a notarized affidavit from a witness who’d testify to false allegations about me and requested sealed medical records for child abuse
He took on a case that his father was over. We had no idea that this was not Legal. He refuse and my opinion to object to things that he needed to object to he refuse to play a short video showing that the black eye was on the four year-old as he’s running over to my vehicle at the child exchange that was the first child exchange in six weeks where the children had been with the father solely. The children were taken to the emergency room and when child protective services failed to make contact within 24 hours, Cook Children’s sent us to the Arlington Texas police station because that’s where the father was living and the abuse happened in the father‘s care. This attorney was told to subpoena. The records from Cook Children’s actually told me that he had subpoena the records from Cook Children’s. He also told us that he subpoenaed the records from total compliance Network, which was the hair follicle drug test that. Edited by Loren Hobbs of step one Waxahachie and she testified on the stand that she edited the drug test results. A 10 panel haired follicle drug test result was turned into a nine panel hair, follicle drug test result and she’s trying to say because she’s a forensic certified laboratory that she can edit those drug test results that she did not perform and that the panel that is missing is covered in the other nine panels. No, it’s not the panel that’s missing are the street drugs which there are no prescriptions available for and the judge just accepts her testimony and the attorney accepts her testimony and the attorney just ignores this and he has told us he subpoenaed these records and not those records were never subpoenaed. He fired himself after our daughter and I both called him and said that we got the records from Cook Children’s Medical Center because after they heard that the children were sent back with the father and no hearing was held they unsealed the records for the the mother only to come and get a copy so that she could present them to the court, but both judge Lundberg and Judge Wallace have ignored all evidence and testimony of child abuse Greg Lundberg has not objected to witnesses who are not professional witnesses. Greg Lundberg has not objected to testimony that should not be allowed in court he’s allowing police officers to testify as psychological experts and when my daughter‘s home was force broken into and a human tooth was left in her kitchen and the father did get a full set of false teeth. That tooth was turned over to the Midlothian police Department, who has yet to tell us anything about it or to identify it and it’s been over a year since they’ve had it. I think a DNA result can happen within a year’s time I have recordings of phone calls with the chief of police with police officers, I mean, laughing at us when we’re trying to report violations by the father they don’t care one bit what they do care about is being outed publicly
Discouraged me from seeking enforcement and contempt for court order violations by my ex. He also discouraged me from seeking a therapist who'd be willing to testify in court about the effects of my exes behavior on my child's mental health.
Suborned perjury, made multiple misrepresentations, conspired with judge, committed so many crimes against me as far as his legal obligations as an attorney

These are allegations reported directly by families through the survey. They are published because 4 unrelated households independently described this court actor — the public-record threshold.

Family-reported submissions.