Meg from Stand With Meg + Shawn Lee · Criminal trial attorney

How families can document potential FRAUD

The Shawn Lee Report with Meg from Stand with Meg, investigative legal series poster
EXPOSE. EDUCATE. EMPOWER.

Full episodes are free on YouTube and the podcast, start at the episodes page. Every episode ends with a free public live Q&A. Subscribers get Q&A priority, behind-the-scenes access, and bonus content. Preview reels on Facebook, Instagram & TikTok.

STANDWITHMEG.COMBUILT FROM FAMILY-REPORTED SUBMISSIONS ACROSS ALL 50 STATES
● SURVEY OPEN, 5,842 FAMILY REPORTS 381 PUBLIC ACTORS AT THRESHOLD
$1.0B+ REPORTED FINANCIAL HARM
DOJ NATIONAL FRAUD ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
18 U.S.C. § 1343 • WIRE FRAUD
The Shawn Lee Report Episode 9, No One Is Coming to Save You. How to draft a law enforcement affidavit. Criminal attorney Shawn Lee and investigative journalist Meg.

EPISODE 9 • LIVE NOW · FREE ON YOUTUBE

No One Is Coming to Save You.

Every fraud indictment in this series started with a victim who put the facts in writing. Shawn walks real sworn affidavits, a Wichita Police detective’s probable-cause affidavit in a Sedgwick County, Kansas false-information case (charged, not convicted, jury trial set for November 2026), a six-page FBI wire-fraud affidavit, an IRS Criminal Investigation affidavit for alleged wire-fraud conspiracy and money laundering, and Percoco v. United States, the Supreme Court’s honest-services fraud case, and shows what investigators actually put on the page. Then his four-legs-of-the-table theory for when police say “that’s a civil matter,” Missouri’s new lawyer-discipline rules effective January 1, 2027, and his read on the Clancy family’s civil complaint against telehealth providers. Allegations, not findings. Education, not legal advice.

Episode 9 documents

Read the records for yourself: 8 PDFs for the cases discussed in Episode 9, including companion filings, plus the Missouri Bar article below. Downloads are free and do not require a Google account. Additional shared-folder material is in the research library.

Affidavits and charging documents describe allegations, not proof of guilt. Dockets show the record as of their download date; they are not live case updates.

  • Download: Michael DiMassa — FBI affidavit (PDF, 6 pages)
    October 2021 sworn statement describing alleged misuse of West Haven COVID-relief funds. The agent follows invoices, city payments, bank deposits, withdrawals, and witness interviews to explain the basis for a wire-fraud complaint.
    Folder files: DiMASSA-Michael-affidavit.pdf and DiMASSA-Michael-affidavit-2.pdf are identical.
  • Download: White, Johnson, and Grontis — IRS affidavit (PDF, 12 pages)
    Filed August 23, 2012, this sworn statement supports a criminal complaint and arrest warrant. It explains an investigator’s basis for alleged wire-fraud conspiracy, money laundering, and related charges, drawing on interviews and financial records.
    Folder file: White-Affidavit.pdf.
  • Download: Percoco v. United States — petition appendix (PDF, 144 pages)
    The appendix to a Supreme Court review petition collects earlier court decisions and case materials concerning honest-services fraud. This is historical litigation material, not the Supreme Court’s final ruling. Read it alongside the May 11, 2023 Supreme Court opinion, which rejected the challenged jury instruction.
    Folder file: 20220217145509562_Percoco v. United States - Cert Petition Appendix.pdf.
  • Download: David K. Elliott — indictment (PDF, 14 pages)
    Filed August 18, 2026, in Southern Illinois case 3:26-cr-30108-SMY. The indictment sets out bank- and mail-fraud charges involving an attorney’s handling of funds, including his role as guardian ad litem. It is a charging document, not a conviction; this same record is linked under Episode 8.
    Folder file: 06916553999.pdf.

Kansas records: State v. Shawn P. McMahon

A Sedgwick County, Kansas criminal case against a former Wichita police detective, charged under K.S.A. 21-5824 (Making False Information), the same statute Shawn walks in Episode 5. These are scanned copies of the public court filings. A complaint and an affidavit describe allegations; they are not findings, and the defendant is presumed innocent.

Also cited: how Missouri polices its own lawyers

Read at the publisher: “Ethics: Lawyer disciplinary system to undergo restructure” (Missouri Bar, Vol. 82, No. 2, March–April 2026, by Hon. Zel Fischer and Andrea K. Spillars)
On February 24, 2026 the Supreme Court of Missouri issued new rules, effective January 1, 2027, that move every lawyer-complaint investigation into the full-time Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel and end the volunteer regional committees that have handled Kansas City, St. Louis, and Springfield complaints since 1991. Useful context for who actually investigates when a family files a complaint against an attorney. The article is the Missouri Bar’s copyrighted work, so we link to it rather than host a copy.

Also discussed in Episode 9

Download: Clancy v. Tufts — amended civil complaint (PDF)
The filed civil claims discussed later in the episode. A complaint presents the plaintiffs’ allegations; it is not a court ruling.

General legal education, not legal advice for your situation.

The Stand With Meg Show with Shawn Lee teaching what families were never told.

Meg hosts. Shawn Lee, a criminal trial attorney and U.S. Army veteran, teaches a careful framework for organizing records, understanding possible fraud elements, and finding the right public reporting door. His framework is a theory to evaluate, not a conclusion about anyone's case.

Episode 9 is live. Episodes 1 through 9 are free on YouTube and the podcast. Every episode ends with a free public live Q&A with Shawn and Meg. Subscribe on Facebook or Instagram for Q&A priority, behind-the-scenes access, and bonus content.

WHAT WE'RE DOING, IN SHAWN'S WORDS

"We are building a coalition." Shawn Lee, on what this series is about. Watch on YouTube.

Electronic court systems can supply the “wire” element, but a wire alone is not fraud.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 1343, prosecutors generally must prove a scheme to defraud, intent, and use of an interstate wire in furtherance of that scheme. Shawn teaches families to separate those elements instead of treating every electronic filing as a crime.

  • → A Zoom hearing may involve interstate electronic transmission
  • → An e-filed document is transmitted electronically
  • → A billing email or portal charge may be relevant only when the other elements are supported by facts
LEARN HOW TO DOCUMENT IT →
Shawn Lee reviewing documents in a law library
THE UNIVERSAL COMPLAINT

Same story, families all over the country

"I needed a divorce or a custody order, but it cost way more than it should have, took longer than it should have, and oh, by the way, you destroyed our family."

That pattern didn't appear in a vacuum. It rose in direct conjunction with virtual courts, Zoom hearings sold as cheaper because you don't have to drive to the courthouse.

Shawn Lee and Meg, The Shawn Lee Report with Stand With Meg
SHAWN LEE
"I consider this public service. I'm giving families the tools to fight for themselves, portions of the law they may not know exist."
Criminal Trial Attorney · The Shawn Lee Report
01 · EXPOSE

5,842 family-reported submissions, still growing via the survey. More than $1 billion in reported financial harm. 381 public actors currently meet the three-family threshold.

02 · EDUCATE

Wire fraud. Mail fraud. §1503. Shawn reads the statutes; Meg translates them for the kitchen table, so you know which federal door fits your facts.

03 · EMPOWER

Public source documents today. A paid Facebook subscription for show extras. Separate $150 and $500 session-request paths when you need a human.

THE DATA NO ONE ELSE HAS

Thousands of family reports.
Patterns worth examining carefully.

50
U.S. States Represented
Family-reported submissions span every U.S. state.
$1.0B+
Reported Financial Losses
Family-reported across 5,842 families. Still growing.
5,842
Family-Reported Submissions
3,153 of those families said they were representing themselves.
381
Public Court Actors
Currently meeting the three-family threshold at standwithmeg.com, and still growing.
DOJ uses data-driven investigative techniques to identify possible fraud. Family-reported data can raise questions, but it does not prove a crime.
FAMILY-REPORTED SUBMISSIONS.

We're still collecting parent submissions so Shawn and Meg can see whether the same fraud patterns keep showing up in your courts. If you haven't shared your experience yet, the survey is open.

EXPLORE

Everything you need, one click away

THE BENCH · CRIMINAL ATTORNEYS

Motions go back to the same judge. A complaint goes somewhere else.

Shawn is licensed in Kansas and Missouri. For every other state, we are building a bench of criminal lawyers he can teach. Families tell us their state. Attorneys apply in five minutes. Listings are flat-fee advertising. Never a cut of a case.

For families

I want a criminal attorney in my state

Your email stays private. This is not legal advice.

I AM A CRIMINAL LAWYER, APPLY → READ THE BENCH →
ONE-ON-ONE HELP

Choose the consult that fits what you need.

Meg's $150 consult is information organization and public-resource education only, no legal advice. Shawn's $500 consult begins with a request that his office must review and approve.

Compare both scopes and the booking process →
STILL GROWING, WE NEED YOUR STORY

Help Shawn & Meg spot fraud in the patterns

5,842 family-reported submissions and counting, plus 381 public court actors currently meeting the three-family threshold. Every new survey helps show whether reported patterns repeat.

Follow Meg

FacebookFacebook OfficialInstagramTikTokYouTubeX

Follow Shawn

FacebookInstagramTikTokX

Share your story: StandwithMeg.com

Terms and conditions · Privacy